If you have 5 minutes, this page will tell you everything you need to know about what we do, who we do it for, and how we are different from every other firm in the market.

We are a cybersecurity and compliance implementation firm. Not advisors. Not auditors. Not tool vendors. We do the actual work. We fix your security gaps, build your compliance program, get you certified, and keep you secure after the auditor leaves.

We serve mid-market companies (200-2,000 employees) in SaaS, FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Financial Services. Our clients typically have one thing in common: they need enterprise-grade security but do not have the budget or headcount to build it internally.

Here is everything we do, in detail.

Risk assessments and gap analysis

This is where most client relationships start. We look under the hood and find out where you actually stand.

We do not send you a questionnaire and compile the answers into a PDF. We get into your environment. We review your cloud configurations against CIS Benchmarks. We pull your identity provider data to see who has access to what. We trace your data flows from customer input to every storage location and third-party integration. We examine your business processes to find the risks that no scanner can detect: segregation of duties failures, unencrypted data in downstream workflows, vendor relationships with no security oversight.

The output is a findings report with every gap mapped to the compliance framework you are targeting, a certification readiness score, and a prioritized remediation roadmap that accounts for your team's capacity, your budget, and your timeline.

Our gap analysis runs as a Quick Fix 30 engagement: $5,000-$15,000, completed in 2-3 weeks. If you move forward with a full certification engagement, the gap analysis investment applies to the project.

Security remediation

This is what separates us from every advisory firm in the market. We do not hand you a list of findings and say "good luck." We fix the problems. And we do not let go until they are closed.

We enforce multi-factor authentication where it is missing. We close dormant accounts and over-privileged access. We harden cloud configurations. We build change management processes for teams that have none. We establish incident response workflows with defined roles, communication plans, and escalation paths. We configure logging and monitoring so your team has visibility into what is happening in your environment. We set up vendor risk management programs from scratch. We build identity management systems with SSO, automated provisioning, and role-based access control.

Every risk we identify gets an owner, a remediation plan, and a deadline. We do not document risks and move on to the next section. We follow up. We check whether the fix was implemented. We verify it is working. We close the risk in Dashr when it is confirmed resolved. If a remediation stalls because it needs a business decision, a vendor response, or a maintenance window, we track it, escalate it, and keep it visible until it is done.

We start with what a hacker would exploit, not what an auditor needs to see. Security first. Certification second. That is the fundamental difference in our approach. Most firms start with the audit checklist and work backwards. We start with your actual risk landscape and work forward. The certification becomes the natural byproduct of actually being secure.

Compliance certification

Full-service implementation for SOC 2 Type I and Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI Governance), HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Audit-ready in 90 days. 100% first-attempt pass rate across 50+ engagements. 87-day average completion. Zero missed deadlines. Money-back guarantee if we miss the timeline.

Here is what "full-service" means in practice. We write your policies, all 40+ of them, customized to your operations, not generic templates with your company name swapped in. We implement your controls, both technical and administrative. We collect your evidence, automated through Dashr.ai wherever possible. We run a mock audit before your real audit, sitting in the auditor's chair and catching every finding before the real auditor does. We coordinate with your external auditor, managing the process so your team's involvement is measured in hours, not weeks.

Every certification engagement includes Year 1 access to Dashr.ai ($15,000 value) for continuous compliance monitoring after certification.

Pricing: SOC 2 at $20,000-$50,000. ISO 27001 at $25,000-$60,000. ISO 42001 at $25,000-$60,000. HIPAA at $15,000-$40,000. PCI DSS at $20,000-$40,000. ISO 27001 + SOC 2 bundle available at significant savings (approximately 80% control overlap).

For comparison: Big 4 firms deliver the same certifications in 9-12 months for $75,000-$150,000+ using junior consultants. We deliver in 90 days at 40-60% less cost with senior practitioners only.

Penetration testing

We run the pentest. We do not tell you to "go find a vendor."

Our penetration testing follows a structured four-phase methodology: reconnaissance, enumeration, exploitation, and reporting. We use industry-standard tools (Nmap, Burp Suite, Nessus, Nuclei) combined with manual verification to eliminate false positives and assess real-world exploitability.

We test external networks, internal networks, web applications, and cloud environments. We run social engineering simulations including phishing campaigns to assess employee awareness.

The critical difference in our reporting: every finding includes the business impact (not just a CVSS score), a step-by-step remediation plan (not just "apply the patch"), and a priority ranking based on how likely the vulnerability is to be exploited in the real world. We walk your engineering team through every finding so they understand not just what to fix, but why and how.

After remediation, we retest to verify the fixes are effective. A pentest that finds problems without confirming they are fixed is an incomplete engagement.

Pricing: $8,000-$20,000 depending on scope and complexity.

Security architecture review

We examine how every component in your environment connects, communicates, trusts, and fails.

We map your actual network topology: every segment, subnet, peering connection, VPN tunnel, and ingress/egress point. We evaluate your trust boundaries: where implicit trust exists inside your network perimeter and where zero-trust principles should be applied. We trace your data flows end to end, identifying where encryption is present and where it is absent. We assess failure modes: does your system fail open (allowing traffic without security checks) or fail closed (blocking until resolved)?

We map every architectural finding to the applicable compliance framework: SOC 2 trust service criteria, ISO 27001 Annex A controls, NIST CSF subcategories, or CIS Controls. The result is not just a list of vulnerabilities. It is a complete picture of what is non-compliant, what is at risk, and what to prioritize.

Configuration review

Vulnerability scanners tell you whether your software is patched. Configuration reviews tell you whether your software is hardened. Both matter. Most companies only do the first.

We compare your server, cloud, database, and application configurations against CIS Benchmarks, which contain hundreds of specific settings checks per system. We review IAM policies at the statement level, examining individual permission grants rather than just role names. We verify database encryption, transport security, audit logging, and service account privileges. We check application-level settings: password hashing algorithms, session management, CORS policies, HTTP security headers.

We align every finding to NIST SP 800-53 control families, ISO 27001 Annex A.8 technology controls, and CIS Controls v8 implementation groups scaled to your organization's maturity level.

A fully patched server with 40 hardening gaps is not secure. It is current. Those are different things.

Technical security posture: CIS 18 Controls implementation

Every service described on this page contributes to one overarching goal: measurably improving your technical cybersecurity posture. The framework we use to measure and drive that improvement is CIS 18, the Center for Internet Security's 18 Critical Security Controls.

CIS 18 is not a compliance framework like SOC 2 or ISO 27001. It is a prioritized, actionable set of security controls based on real-world attack data. It tells you what to implement, in what order, based on what actually stops breaches. We use it as the operational backbone for every engagement because it answers the question that compliance frameworks do not: "Are we actually secure, or are we just compliant?"

Here is how we implement it.

We start by assessing your current maturity against all 18 control families: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets, Inventory and Control of Software Assets, Data Protection, Secure Configuration of Enterprise Assets and Software, Account Management, Access Control Management, Continuous Vulnerability Management, Audit Log Management, Email and Web Browser Protections, Malware Defenses, Data Recovery, Network Infrastructure Management, Network Monitoring and Defense, Security Awareness and Skills Training, Service Provider Management, Application Software Security, Incident Response Management, and Penetration Testing.

Each control family gets a maturity percentage in Dashr. The screenshot in Post 35 shows this in action: Asset and Configuration Management at 31%, Secure Development and Change Management at 14%, Network and Infrastructure Security at 9%, Vulnerability and Threat Management at 7%, Business Continuity at 3%, Governance, Risk, and Compliance at 3%. Those are real Day 1 numbers from a real client. Every number is measured, not estimated.

We then implement controls in priority order using the CIS Implementation Groups model. Implementation Group 1 (IG1) covers the foundational controls that every organization needs regardless of size: basic asset inventory, controlled use of admin privileges, secure configurations, continuous vulnerability assessment, controlled access, audit logging, email protections, malware defenses, data recovery, and security awareness. For most mid-market companies, achieving full IG1 coverage eliminates the majority of real-world attack vectors.

Implementation Group 2 (IG2) adds controls for organizations handling sensitive data or operating in regulated environments: expanded asset management, data protection controls, enhanced logging and monitoring, network segmentation, application security, and formalized incident response. This is where most of our certification clients land because IG2 aligns closely with SOC 2 and ISO 27001 control requirements.

Implementation Group 3 (IG3) adds advanced controls for organizations with significant security resources and high-value targets: advanced penetration testing, red team exercises, comprehensive security awareness programs, and formal security architecture review.

The power of CIS 18 is that it creates a measurable, repeatable improvement path. Every working meeting, we review the maturity percentages in Dashr. Every control we implement moves a specific CIS category forward. Every percentage point increase represents a concrete reduction in attack surface.

By the end of a 90-day engagement, a client that started at single-digit maturity percentages across most categories is typically at 70-90% across IG1 and IG2 controls. That improvement is not subjective. It is measured. The Dashr dashboard proves it, the auditor validates it, and the client's environment is demonstrably harder to breach than it was on Day 1.

CIS 18 is also the bridge between security and compliance. When we implement CIS Control 5 (Account Management) and Control 6 (Access Control Management), we are simultaneously satisfying SOC 2 CC6.1-6.3, ISO 27001 A.5.15-5.18, and NIST 800-53 AC-family requirements. One set of controls, mapped to multiple frameworks. This is how we deliver compliance certification in 90 days without cutting corners: the security work IS the compliance work when it is structured around CIS 18.

This is what "Security-First, Certification-Second" means in practice. We implement controls that make you secure. Those controls map to frameworks. The frameworks produce certifications. The certifications open doors. But the foundation is always the security controls, not the audit checklist.

Identity management

For companies with no centralized identity system, we build it from scratch.

We consolidate authentication into a single identity provider (Entra ID, Okta, Google Workspace, or JumpCloud depending on your existing ecosystem). We connect every SaaS application via SAML or OIDC single sign-on. We enforce MFA with conditional access policies that adapt to user location, device, and risk level. We build automated provisioning and deprovisioning connected to your HR system so that account creation and termination happen in seconds, not days. We implement role-based access control with permissions mapped to documented business justifications. We set up quarterly access reviews so managers can verify their team's access in 15 minutes.

The typical identity management build takes 3-6 weeks. The result is a centralized, auditable, automated system that satisfies SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST 800-53 access control requirements while eliminating hours of manual IT work every month.

Device and asset security management

Every employee device is an entry point. A laptop without full disk encryption that gets stolen is a data breach. A workstation missing security patches is a vulnerability that attackers actively scan for. A phone without management enrollment that accesses company email and cloud applications is an unmanaged risk.

We do not just write endpoint policies and hope your IT team implements them. We get into the actual platforms that manage, monitor, and protect your devices and infrastructure. We configure them, tune them, monitor what they are telling us, and act on what we find.

We work with SentinelOne for endpoint detection and response. We deploy agents, configure detection policies, review threat detections, investigate alerts, and manage endpoint compliance. When SentinelOne flags a suspicious process on an employee's laptop, we investigate it as part of the active monitoring cadence, not next week during a scheduled review.

We work with NinjaOne (NinjaRMM) for device management and asset visibility. We maintain a complete inventory of every device in your environment. We monitor patch status across your fleet. We verify that full disk encryption is enabled on every endpoint. We confirm that security software is installed and running. We track which devices are compliant with your security policies and which have drifted.

We work with the Microsoft security ecosystem. Defender for Endpoint, Defender for Office 365, Entra ID for identity protection, Purview for data loss prevention, Intune for device compliance and application management, and Sentinel for clients who need SIEM-level visibility. Most M365 customers are paying for these capabilities in their E3 or E5 licenses and using a fraction of them. We activate, configure, and operationalize what you already own.

We work with Google Workspace security. Admin console security settings, advanced phishing protection, DLP rules, endpoint management, context-aware access, security investigation tools, and audit logging. For Google-native organizations, the built-in security capabilities are substantial when properly configured.

We work with AWS security services. GuardDuty for threat detection, Security Hub for centralized findings, IAM Access Analyzer for permission review, CloudTrail for audit logging, Config for configuration tracking, Macie for sensitive data discovery, and Inspector for vulnerability management.

We work with Azure security. Defender for Cloud, Azure Policy, Network Security Groups, Key Vault, Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, and Entra ID for hybrid identity scenarios.

Every endpoint tool and cloud security service feeds into Dashr.ai, contributing to the centralized security score and compliance tracking. When a device falls out of compliance, when a cloud configuration drifts, when an endpoint misses patch cycles, it surfaces in the dashboard and gets addressed in the next working meeting.

Tool-agnostic by design

We are not a SentinelOne shop. We are not a Microsoft shop. We are not an AWS shop. We are a security shop that works with whatever tools you have.

If you run CrowdStrike instead of SentinelOne, we work in CrowdStrike. If you use Jamf instead of NinjaOne for your Mac fleet, we work in Jamf. If you are on GCP instead of AWS, we work in GCP. If you have a SIEM from Splunk, Elastic, or Datadog, we work with it. If you use Okta instead of Entra for identity, we configure Okta.

We do not walk in and tell you to rip out your existing tools and replace them with our preferred stack. That is the opposite of ruthless minimalism. Your tools are your tools. Our job is to make sure they are configured correctly, monitored actively, and producing the security outcomes you need.

Before we recommend any new tool, we exhaust what you already own. We activate the dormant capabilities. We configure the unused features. We connect the tools to each other so they share data instead of operating in silos. Most clients are surprised to find they are using 20-30% of the security capabilities they are already paying for.

Only after we have maximized your existing investment do we evaluate whether a gap remains that requires a new tool. And when we do recommend something, we recommend the simplest, most cost-effective option that fits your team's ability to operate it. Not the market leader. Not the analyst favorite. The one that works for your people, your infrastructure, and your budget.

The tool is never the solution. The configuration, the monitoring discipline, and the response process around the tool are the solution. A perfectly selected security tool that is misconfigured and unmonitored provides zero protection. A "good enough" tool that is properly hardened, actively monitored, and integrated into a response workflow provides real security.

Log analysis and anomaly monitoring

Security tools generate data. Logs, alerts, events, anomalies. The data is only useful if someone is reading it, understanding it, and acting on it. That someone is us.

We perform hands-on log analysis and anomaly monitoring across every major platform in your environment. This is not automated report generation. This is experienced practitioners reviewing log data, identifying patterns that indicate security issues, and investigating anomalies before they become incidents.

In Microsoft environments, we work with Microsoft Sentinel, Defender alerts, Entra ID sign-in logs, and Unified Audit Logs across Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. We review failed authentication patterns, impossible travel detections, risky sign-in events, privilege escalation alerts, mailbox forwarding rule changes, and data access anomalies. When Entra flags a sign-in from an unfamiliar location on an admin account, we investigate it. When Defender raises an alert on a suspicious process, we triage it and determine whether it is a true threat or noise.

In Google Workspace, we analyze Admin audit logs, Login audit logs, Drive activity, and Gmail logs. We look for bulk file downloads, external sharing of sensitive documents, OAuth application grants to unverified third parties, suspicious login activity, and changes to security settings. Google's alert center provides the signals. We provide the analysis and response.

In AWS, we analyze CloudTrail logs for unauthorized API calls, IAM policy modifications, security group changes, S3 bucket permission changes, and root account usage. We review GuardDuty findings for reconnaissance activity, credential compromise indicators, and unusual data access patterns. We monitor VPC Flow Logs for network traffic anomalies that could indicate lateral movement or data exfiltration.

In Azure, we work with Azure Monitor, Activity Logs, Defender for Cloud alerts, and Log Analytics workspaces. We track resource modifications, network security group changes, key vault access patterns, and identity protection events.

For clients with a dedicated SIEM (Splunk, Elastic, QRadar, Datadog, Sumo Logic, or any other platform), we work within that SIEM. We tune detection rules to reduce false positives. We build correlation rules that connect events across multiple data sources. We review the alert queue and investigate escalated events. We adjust thresholds based on what we learn about the client's normal operating patterns so the signal-to-noise ratio improves over time.

For clients without a SIEM, we build monitoring capability using the native logging and alerting tools in their existing platforms. Microsoft Sentinel (included in many E5 licenses), AWS CloudTrail with EventBridge rules, Google Workspace alert center, and application-level audit logs can provide meaningful detection coverage without the cost and operational burden of a standalone SIEM. The right approach depends on the client's environment, team capacity, and risk profile.

Here is what we are looking for across all platforms:

Authentication anomalies. Spikes in failed login attempts, logins from new geographies, logins at unusual hours, concurrent sessions from different locations, and successful logins immediately following multiple failures. These are the earliest indicators of credential compromise.

Privilege escalation. Any event where a user account gains elevated permissions, especially outside of a documented change request. An engineer whose account suddenly has admin access to the production database at 11 PM is worth investigating immediately.

Configuration changes. Security group modifications, firewall rule changes, IAM policy updates, and encryption setting changes that happen outside scheduled maintenance windows. Attackers who gain access often modify security configurations to expand their foothold or create persistence mechanisms.

Data movement patterns. Bulk exports, large downloads, email forwards to external addresses, and unusual API query volumes. A user account that normally accesses 50 records per day suddenly pulling 15,000 records is an anomaly that needs investigation regardless of whether that user is authorized to access the data.

Application errors and failures. Spikes in 403 (forbidden) or 401 (unauthorized) responses can indicate an attacker probing for access. Unusual error rates in authentication services can indicate a brute-force campaign. Application crashes following specific inputs can indicate exploitation attempts.

We do not just detect anomalies. We investigate them, determine root cause, and take action. An alert without investigation is noise. An investigation without action is documentation. We complete the cycle: detect, investigate, respond, close, and document the lesson learned.

The findings from log analysis feed directly into Dashr.ai, informing the security score, updating the risk register, and contributing to the maturity assessment. When log analysis reveals a pattern (for example, repeated access attempts from a specific IP range), it becomes a risk item that gets tracked, remediated, and verified through the same working meeting cadence as every other finding.

Data security and protection

Data is the asset that every other security control exists to protect. We build data security programs that ensure you know where your sensitive data lives, who can access it, and what happens when it moves.

We start with data discovery and classification. Most companies do not have a clear picture of where their sensitive data actually resides. Customer PII might be in the production database, but it is also in analytics pipelines, test environments, email attachments, shared drives, third-party integrations, and backups that nobody has inventoried. We map every location where sensitive data exists and classify it by sensitivity level: public, internal, confidential, and restricted.

We implement data loss prevention controls tailored to your environment. This does not mean buying a $100,000 DLP platform. For most mid-market companies, it means configuring the data protection capabilities already built into the platforms you own. Microsoft Purview for M365 environments. Google Workspace DLP rules. AWS Macie for S3 buckets. We identify where sensitive data is leaving your environment (email, file sharing, SaaS integrations, USB drives) and put controls on the specific exit points that matter.

We build data retention and disposal programs. The data you do not need is the data that cannot be breached. Retaining customer records for 7 years when you are only required to keep them for 2 creates 5 years of unnecessary risk. We help you define retention schedules by data type, implement automated archival and deletion policies, and reduce the volume of sensitive data that needs protecting.

We configure encryption at every layer. Data in transit (TLS 1.2+ on all connections, including internal service-to-service traffic). Data at rest (database encryption, storage encryption, backup encryption). Data on endpoints (full disk encryption on every managed device). The goal is that if any storage medium, any backup tape, any laptop is compromised, the data on it is unreadable.

We assess data handling across your business processes. This is where we find the gaps that technology alone cannot close. A secure web form that emails unencrypted attachments to a shared drive. An analytics pipeline that ingests unmasked PII into a warehouse with weaker access controls than production. An offboarding process that does not revoke access to the customer database until days after termination. These are process gaps, not technology gaps, and they are where the most damaging data exposures originate.

Privacy compliance

Privacy and security go together like peanut butter and jelly. You cannot have privacy without security, and a security program without privacy considerations leaves your organization exposed to regulatory risk that compounds every year.

We build privacy programs aligned to the regulatory landscape that applies to your business.

For companies subject to CCPA/CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act and California Privacy Rights Act), we implement the required consumer rights workflows: the right to know what personal information is being collected, the right to delete personal information, the right to opt-out of the sale or sharing of personal information, and the right to correct inaccurate information. We build the intake process, the verification procedures, the response workflows, and the documentation trail that demonstrates compliance.

For companies handling health information, HIPAA privacy requirements overlay the security controls. We ensure that protected health information (PHI) is handled with the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards required by the Privacy Rule. We build Business Associate Agreements into your vendor management program. We implement minimum necessary standards so that employees access only the PHI required for their specific job function.

For companies with European customers or operations, GDPR considerations inform every design decision. Data minimization, purpose limitation, storage limitation, and privacy by design principles are built into the security architecture, not bolted on after the fact. We help you understand your obligations as a data controller or processor and build the documentation to demonstrate compliance.

We align privacy programs to the NIST Privacy Framework, which provides a structured, risk-based approach to managing privacy that integrates directly with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. This means your privacy controls and your security controls share a common language, common risk assessment methodology, and common governance structure. No duplication. No gaps between the two programs.

For companies pursuing SOC 2 with the Privacy trust service criterion, we implement the additional controls covering notice, choice and consent, collection, use, retention and disposal, access, and disclosure and notification. This is increasingly requested by enterprise buyers, and having it in your SOC 2 report differentiates you from competitors who only cover Security.

Privacy compliance is not a one-time project. Regulations evolve. State privacy laws are multiplying. The EU AI Act adds new requirements for companies processing personal data through AI systems. We build programs that adapt to regulatory changes without requiring a complete rebuild every time a new law takes effect.

Attack surface monitoring

Your external attack surface is everything an attacker can see about your organization from the outside without any credentials or access. It is the first thing they probe before attempting a breach.

Most companies do not have an accurate picture of their own attack surface. Subdomains from old marketing campaigns are still resolving. Staging environments are still accessible from the internet. Development servers with default credentials are exposed. SSL certificates reveal internal hostnames. DNS records expose infrastructure that was supposed to be internal.

We conduct comprehensive attack surface assessments using the same techniques and tools that real attackers use.

We enumerate every externally-facing asset: domains, subdomains, IP addresses, open ports, running services, exposed APIs, cloud resources, and publicly accessible management interfaces. We use DNS reconnaissance, certificate transparency log analysis, Shodan and Censys scanning, and web application fingerprinting to build a complete map of what the internet can see about your organization.

We identify exposed credentials and leaked data. We check whether employee credentials have appeared in known breach databases. We monitor paste sites, code repositories (GitHub, GitLab), and public data sources for inadvertent exposure of API keys, database connection strings, internal documentation, or configuration files that should never be public.

We assess your digital footprint for impersonation risk. Are there domains registered that are similar to yours that could be used for phishing? Are there fake social media profiles impersonating your executives? Are your SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records configured to prevent email spoofing of your domain?

We map your external findings to internal risk. A forgotten staging environment with default credentials is not just an external exposure. It is a potential entry point that could give an attacker access to production systems, internal networks, or customer data. Every external finding gets assessed for internal blast radius.

We reduce the surface. This is where most attack surface management tools stop: they show you the map and leave you to fix it. We take down the forgotten systems, close the unnecessary ports, revoke the exposed credentials, decommission the abandoned subdomains, and harden the services that need to remain external. The attack surface gets smaller, not just documented.

For ongoing monitoring, Dashr.ai tracks changes to your external surface over time. New subdomains appearing, new services exposed, certificate expirations approaching, and credential exposure alerts are surfaced automatically. The goal is that your attack surface never grows silently. Every change is deliberate, approved, and documented.

Continuous security intelligence via Dashr.ai

Dashr.ai is not a SIEM. It is not a log aggregator. It is not an alert engine.

Dashr.ai is a security intelligence platform that tells every stakeholder, from the board to the engineer, exactly where you stand, whether you are getting better or worse, and what to fix next.

A SIEM monitors your infrastructure for threats in real time. It watches network traffic, correlates log events, and fires alerts when something looks suspicious. If you have a SOC team reviewing alerts 24/7, a SIEM is the tool they operate. Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic, and QRadar are SIEMs. They answer one question: "Is something bad happening right now?"

Dashr.ai operates at a different altitude. It monitors your security program, not your network traffic. It evaluates whether your controls are actually working, whether your compliance status is current across every framework you are certified against, whether your risk posture is improving or degrading month over month, and which specific actions will have the highest impact on reducing your exposure.

Here is what that looks like in practice.

Your SIEM fires 4,000 alerts a day. Dashr tells you that your overall security score is 78, up from 71 last month, because you closed 6 control gaps and your MFA coverage went from 82% to 97%.

Your SIEM tells your analyst that a login attempt came from an unusual IP address. Dashr tells your CISO that your vendor management program has 4 vendors with expired SOC 2 reports and your access review is 60 days overdue, which means your ISO 27001 surveillance audit next quarter has 2 open risks.

Your SIEM generates a compliance report by pulling log data. Dashr generates a compliance report by evaluating whether every control in your SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or PCI DSS scope is operating, evidenced, and current. Not whether the logs exist. Whether the entire security program is functioning.

The simplest way to think about it: a SIEM watches for bad things happening. Dashr watches for good things not happening.

Most mid-market companies do not need a full SIEM. They do not have a SOC team to operate one. What they need is visibility into whether their security program is working and what is falling behind. That is what Dashr delivers.

For companies that do have a SIEM, Dashr sits on top of it. It pulls signals from the SIEM alongside signals from your identity provider, cloud infrastructure, GRC tools, vulnerability scanners, and ticketing systems, and consolidates everything into one view with one score and one prioritized action list. The SIEM is one data source. Dashr is the intelligence layer.

For MSSPs and vCISOs managing multiple clients, Dashr offers cross-client dashboards, portfolio analytics, rapid onboarding (new client live in hours), and white-label options.

Dashr.ai is included with every recurring engagement and available as a standalone subscription. Platform tiers: Essentials (included with recurring engagements), Professional at $1,000/month (full security scoring, M365 metrics, anomaly detection), Enterprise at $2,500+/month (multi-tenant, white-label, API access).

vCISO advisory

Ongoing strategic security leadership for companies that need a CISO's expertise without a CISO's salary.

Our vCISO service includes board and executive security reporting, security program strategy and roadmap development, risk management and risk register maintenance, vendor security oversight, compliance maintenance and audit preparation, incident response planning and tabletop exercises, security tool evaluation and recommendation, and team mentoring and capability building.

This is not a monthly check-in call. It is embedded, hands-on security leadership delivered by someone with 20+ years of Fortune 500 experience (Goldman Sachs, Pfizer, Warner Bros., EA Sports, State Farm) and active CISSP, CISA, GPEN, GMON, and GCCC certifications.

Pricing: $3,000-$10,000/month depending on scope and hours.

We take ownership until risks are closed

This is the commitment that ties everything above together. We do not identify risks and leave them on a spreadsheet for someone else to chase. We take ownership. We hold ourselves accountable. We proactively follow up until every risk is resolved.

Here is what that looks like in practice.

Every risk identified during an engagement gets logged in Dashr with a severity level, a remediation plan, an assigned owner, and a target closure date. That risk stays open and visible on the dashboard until it is confirmed resolved. Not until someone says it is resolved. Until we verify it is resolved.

We follow up proactively. If a risk is assigned to a client's engineering team and the target date passes without closure, we do not wait for the next scheduled meeting to bring it up. We reach out. We ask what is blocking progress. We help remove the blocker. We reschedule the target date if needed. But we do not let it quietly slip off the radar.

During working meetings, we review every open risk. Not just the new ones. Every open risk, every week. The dashboard makes this automatic because open risks are visible to everyone: our team, the client's team, and leadership. Nothing hides. Nothing ages silently in a forgotten spreadsheet tab.

We treat "on hold" differently from "ignored." Some risks require a business decision, a vendor contract change, or a scheduled maintenance window before they can be addressed. That is legitimate. But "on hold" still means documented, tracked, and reviewed weekly. The moment the blocker clears, the risk moves back to active remediation.

This is what accountability in cybersecurity looks like. Not a report that lists 47 findings with no follow-through. Not a consultant who identifies risks during the engagement and disappears after the final invoice. A partner who stays on every open item until the risk register shows zero open, zero on hold, and a maturity score that proves the work was done.

Most firms measure their success by the deliverables they produce: reports delivered, policies written, certifications achieved. We measure our success by risks closed. A beautiful report with 30 open risks is a failure. A messy spreadsheet with zero open risks is a success. We care about the outcome, not the artifact.

This accountability does not end at certification. For clients on ongoing engagements (vCISO, Dashr monitoring, compliance maintenance), the same discipline continues. New risks surface as environments change, as new tools are deployed, as employees join and leave, as vendors change their security posture. Each one gets the same treatment: identified, documented, owned, tracked, and closed.

Your security posture is only as strong as your weakest open risk. We make sure that list stays as short as possible.

What we do not do

We do not sell tools. We are not resellers. When we recommend a tool, it is because you need it.

We do not provide advisory-only services. We do the work.

We do not staff with junior consultants. Every hour is senior practitioner time.

We do not do managed IT. We are not your help desk. Your MSP handles operations. We secure the environment.

We do not perform compliance audits. We prepare you for the audit and coordinate with independent auditors. The separation matters for audit independence. We absolutely do one-off compliance gap analyses and build you a prioritized roadmap. But the formal audit is conducted by an independent third party.

We do not build custom software. We secure your applications. We do not build them.

How it all fits together

Most clients follow a natural progression:

Start with a gap analysis (Quick Fix 30). Understand where you stand and what it takes to get certified.

Move into a certification engagement (Report Ready 90). Fix the security gaps, build the compliance program, and get audit-ready in 90 days.

Continue with ongoing security (Securely Ever After). vCISO advisory, Dashr.ai monitoring, device and asset management, compliance maintenance, annual penetration testing, privacy program management, and attack surface monitoring keep your security posture strong and your certifications current.

The entry point is always the gap analysis. The relationship grows based on what you need, not what we are trying to sell. And we work with whatever tools you already have, because the best security program is the one that fits your reality, not the one that looks best on a vendor's slide deck.

The team standards behind all of this

Everything on this page is only as good as the people who execute it. Tools do not close risks. Frameworks do not secure environments. People do. Here is what we expect from every member of our security team. These are not aspirational values on a wall. They are the operational baseline.

Proactive. We see work that needs to be done and do it without being told. We flag issues, risks, and blockers before anyone asks. If we notice a client's MFA coverage dropped because a new application was added without SSO, we surface it in the next working meeting. We do not wait for the quarterly review to discover it.

Ownership mindset. We take full accountability for outcomes. Every risk, every remediation, every deliverable has a name on it. We do not hide behind process or delegation. When something is assigned to us, it is ours until it is closed.

Problem solver. When we hit a wall, we research options, test solutions, and bring a recommendation. Not just a question. A client does not hire us to say "this is hard." They hire us to say "this is hard, here are three ways to solve it, and here is which one I recommend for your situation."

Finisher. We complete tasks from start to finish without needing reminders or follow-ups. We track our own work and close it out. A risk that is 90% remediated is still an open risk. We finish.

Client leader. Every team member can run client meetings independently. Set the agenda, drive the conversation, answer questions on the spot, and provide clear next steps. Our clients never experience a meeting where we are unprepared, passive, or waiting for someone else to lead.

Change driver. We have the conviction to push recommendations through resistant organizations. Security changes are often uncomfortable. A team that does not want to enable MFA, an executive who does not want to fund a tool replacement, a vendor who does not want to provide their SOC 2 report. We push through with data, risk context, and business impact. Respectfully and persistently.

Communicative. We keep clients, teammates, and leadership informed in real time. Status, blockers, and wins are shared without being chased. A client should never have to ask "what is happening with my engagement." They should already know because we told them.

Prioritizer. We make decisions about what to work on based on client need and business impact, not personal preference or comfort. If the highest-impact action today is a tedious configuration review, that is what gets done today. Urgency is set by risk, not by what is most interesting.

Innovative. We continuously look for better, faster, smarter ways to deliver. We use AI and automation as accelerators. But professional judgment drives every decision. A tool can flag an anomaly. A human determines whether it is a threat.

Continuous learner. Every team member invests time in studying frameworks, tools, and industry developments. The cybersecurity landscape changes constantly. A practitioner who stopped learning 2 years ago is already behind. We deepen our understanding of why we do what we do, not just how.

These are not values we put on the website and forget about. They are the standards we hold ourselves to on every engagement, in every working meeting, on every client interaction. When a client hires Careful Security, this is the caliber of team that shows up. Every hour. Every time.

One sentence

We get into your tools, fix your security, protect your data, get you certified, and stay accountable until every risk is closed. Full-service. Tool-agnostic. 90 days. Guaranteed.

Ready to see where you stand?

Careful Security's gap analysis identifies every security, compliance, data protection, and privacy gap in your environment in 2-3 weeks. 50+ companies certified. 100% first-attempt audit pass rate. We do the work.

‍